![]() |
| ||
July 17, 2009VIDEO: Rachel Maddow vs. Pat Buchanan, MSNBC 7/16/09My heart pills. I need my heart pills. STAT! Posted by jsmooth995 at July 17, 2009 7:14 AM Comments
Yikes, Rachel wants to socially engineer the supreme court. And she kept misrepresenting what Buchanan argued. The Raw Story also misrepresented Buchanan by putting in quotes words that he didn't say. I want Sotomayor on the court, but for way different reason than Maddow. Posted by: Hashim Warren at July 17, 2009 9:17 AM I also have to disagree with how Rachel Maddow went about trying to push Pat Buchanan's answer/butons. She should have asked the most telling of questions and she touched on it and walked away from it in order to out-shout him, which is "Is Sonia Sotomayor as qualified for this position as the next person? He kept trying to push that she got an unfair advantage with affirmative action. He has a bit of a point in his argument. But his views are skewed so far that he doesn't see the true thing he could fight against. What he (I assume) is against is lower qualified people beating out higher qualified people based solely on race.. I agree with him. But what I was taught is that affirmative action is to use the more racially diverse pick if ALL ELSE IS EQUAL. @ Jay Smooth - Maybe a topic you can look into is today's minority views on Affirmative Action. Because if folks think its a quota that needs to be met and not the qualifications there really is an issue. At least in my humble opinion. Posted by: Belve at July 17, 2009 1:40 PM @Belve: I can give you a 'minority view' on affirmative actions. I'm fascinated by how it is always presented as a 'minority' issue when the largest group of beneficiaries has ALWAYS been white women. Posted by: Delux at July 17, 2009 4:16 PM Hashim, you just say things like this to be contrarian, right? :) I didn't see Rachel misrepresent him in this clip, and didn't hear anything from her about socially engineering the court, but even if I did, do you really find that more worthy of comment than his rant about how white "people built this country" etc? The only minor point I'm not sure I agree with is her framing of it as "privileging race" which I don't think is exactly the problem with Pat's position per se.. it's the nature of his racial argument that's problematic, not just the fact that he's making a race-based argument. Posted by: Jay Smooth at July 17, 2009 4:50 PM I love how osama is more "black" speaking in front of NAACP. If Barry would of spoken like this in Iowa, we may of had a "slightly" better president and maybe even a president that was actually born of two "American Citizens" (most of you illiterates don't know where McCain was born without googleing it). Posted by: lance at July 20, 2009 9:59 PM Post a comment |
Recent Entries
We're On The Radio
DJ Spinna and Krym "New York" Invincible "Emperor's Clothes" Video Henry Louis Gates Interview on Being Arrested Royce's Gambling Stories, on D12 and Eminem
Search Weblog
Weblog Archives
August 2009
July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003 December 2002 November 2002 October 2002 September 2002 August 2002 |